- call +1-201-465-4211
- email sales@mrinsights.biz
Package testing or packaging testing involves the measurement of a characteristic or property involved with packaging. This includes packaging materials, packaging components, primary packages, shipping containers, and unit loads, as well as the associated processes. Testing measures the effects and interactions of the levels of packaging, the package contents, external forces, and end-use.
Scope of the Report:
This report studies the Packaging Testing market status and outlook of Global and major regions, from angles of players, countries, product types and end industries; this report analyzes the top players in global market, and splits the Packaging Testing market by product type and applications/end industries.
Testing can be a qualitative or quantitative procedure. Package testing is often a physical test. With some types of packaging such as food and pharmaceuticals, chemical tests are conducted to determine suitability of food contact materials. Testing programs range from simple tests with little replication to more thorough experimental designs.
The global Packaging Testing market is valued at xx million USD in 2017 and is expected to reach xx million USD by the end of 2023, growing at a CAGR of xx% between 2017 and 2023.
The Asia-Pacific will occupy for more market share in following years, especially in China, also fast growing India and Southeast Asia regions.
North America, especially The United States, will still play an important role which cannot be ignored. Any changes from United States might affect the development trend of Packaging Testing.
Europe also play important roles in global market, with market size of xx million USD in 2017 and will be xx million USD in 2023, with a CAGR of xx%.
Market Segment by Companies, this report covers
SGS
Bureau Veritas
Intertek
Eurofins Scientific
Tüv Süd
ALS Global
Mérieux Nutrisciences
Microbac Laboratories
EMSL Analytical
Campden Bri
IFP
OMIC
Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers
North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)
Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)
Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia)
South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia)
Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)
Market Segment by Type, covers
Physical
Chemical
Microbiological
Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into
Food & beverage
Agrochemicals
Pharmaceuticals
Personal care
The base year for the study has been considered 2019, historic year 2014 and 2018, the forecast period considered is from 2020 to 2027. The regions analyzed for the market include North America, Europe, South America, Asia Pacific, and Middle East and Africa. These regions are further analyzed at the country-level. The study also includes attractiveness analysis of type, application and regions which are benchmarked based on their market size, growth rate and attractiveness in terms of present and future opportunity for understanding the future growth of the market.
Market is segmented on the basis:
The report offers in-depth analysis of driving factors, opportunities, restraints, and challenges for gaining the key insight of the market. The report emphasizes on all the key trends that play a vital role in the enlargement of the market from 2019 to 2026.
The report provides company profile of the key players operating in the market and a comparative analysis based on their business overviews industry offering, segment market share, regional presence, business strategies, innovations, mergers & acquisitions, recent developments, joint venture, collaborations, partnerships, SWOT analysis, and key financial information.
Table of Contents
1 Packaging Testing Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Packaging Testing
1.2 Classification of Packaging Testing by Types
1.2.1 Global Packaging Testing Revenue Comparison by Types (2017-2023)
1.2.2 Global Packaging Testing Revenue Market Share by Types in 2017
1.2.3 Physical
1.2.4 Chemical
1.2.5 Microbiological
1.3 Global Packaging Testing Market by Application
1.3.1 Global Packaging Testing Market Size and Market Share Comparison by Applications (2013-2023)
1.3.2 Food & beverage
1.3.3 Agrochemicals
1.3.4 Pharmaceuticals
1.3.5 Personal care
1.4 Global Packaging Testing Market by Regions
1.4.1 Global Packaging Testing Market Size (Million USD) Comparison by Regions (2013-2023)
1.4.1 North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) Packaging Testing Status and Prospect (2013-2023)
1.4.2 Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) Packaging Testing Status and Prospect (2013-2023)
1.4.3 Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) Packaging Testing Status and Prospect (2013-2023)
1.4.4 South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia) Packaging Testing Status and Prospect (2013-2023)
1.4.5 Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa) Packaging Testing Status and Prospect (2013-2023)
1.5 Global Market Size of Packaging Testing (2013-2023)
2 Manufacturers Profiles
2.1 SGS
2.1.1 Business Overview
2.1.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.1.2.1 Product A
2.1.2.2 Product B
2.1.3 SGS Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.2 Bureau Veritas
2.2.1 Business Overview
2.2.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.2.2.1 Product A
2.2.2.2 Product B
2.2.3 Bureau Veritas Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.3 Intertek
2.3.1 Business Overview
2.3.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.3.2.1 Product A
2.3.2.2 Product B
2.3.3 Intertek Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.4 Eurofins Scientific
2.4.1 Business Overview
2.4.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.4.2.1 Product A
2.4.2.2 Product B
2.4.3 Eurofins Scientific Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.5 Tüv Süd
2.5.1 Business Overview
2.5.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.5.2.1 Product A
2.5.2.2 Product B
2.5.3 Tüv Süd Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.6 ALS Global
2.6.1 Business Overview
2.6.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.6.2.1 Product A
2.6.2.2 Product B
2.6.3 ALS Global Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.7 Mérieux Nutrisciences
2.7.1 Business Overview
2.7.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.7.2.1 Product A
2.7.2.2 Product B
2.7.3 Mérieux Nutrisciences Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.8 Microbac Laboratories
2.8.1 Business Overview
2.8.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.8.2.1 Product A
2.8.2.2 Product B
2.8.3 Microbac Laboratories Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.9 EMSL Analytical
2.9.1 Business Overview
2.9.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.9.2.1 Product A
2.9.2.2 Product B
2.9.3 EMSL Analytical Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.10 Campden Bri
2.10.1 Business Overview
2.10.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.10.2.1 Product A
2.10.2.2 Product B
2.10.3 Campden Bri Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.11 IFP
2.11.1 Business Overview
2.11.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.11.2.1 Product A
2.11.2.2 Product B
2.11.3 IFP Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
2.12 OMIC
2.12.1 Business Overview
2.12.2 Packaging Testing Type and Applications
2.12.2.1 Product A
2.12.2.2 Product B
2.12.3 OMIC Packaging Testing Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share (2016-2017)
3 Global Packaging Testing Market Competition, by Players
3.1 Global Packaging Testing Revenue and Share by Players (2013-2018)
3.2 Market Concentration Rate
3.2.1 Top 5 Packaging Testing Players Market Share
3.2.2 Top 10 Packaging Testing Players Market Share
3.3 Market Competition Trend
4 Global Packaging Testing Market Size by Regions
4.1 Global Packaging Testing Revenue and Market Share by Regions
4.2 North America Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
4.3 Europe Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
4.4 Asia-Pacific Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
4.5 South America Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
4.6 Middle East and Africa Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
5 North America Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries
5.1 North America Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries (2013-2018)
5.2 USA Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
5.3 Canada Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
5.4 Mexico Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
6 Europe Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries
6.1 Europe Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries (2013-2018)
6.2 Germany Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
6.3 UK Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
6.4 France Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
6.5 Russia Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
6.6 Italy Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
7 Asia-Pacific Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries
7.1 Asia-Pacific Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries (2013-2018)
7.2 China Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
7.3 Japan Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
7.4 Korea Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
7.5 India Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
7.6 Southeast Asia Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
8 South America Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries
8.1 South America Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries (2013-2018)
8.2 Brazil Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
8.3 Argentina Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
8.4 Colombia Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
9 Middle East and Africa Revenue Packaging Testing by Countries
9.1 Middle East and Africa Packaging Testing Revenue by Countries (2013-2018)
9.2 Saudi Arabia Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
9.3 UAE Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
9.4 Egypt Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
9.5 Nigeria Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
9.6 South Africa Packaging Testing Revenue and Growth Rate (2013-2018)
10 Global Packaging Testing Market Segment by Type
10.1 Global Packaging Testing Revenue and Market Share by Type (2013-2018)
10.2 Global Packaging Testing Market Forecast by Type (2018-2023)
10.3 Physical Revenue Growth Rate (2013-2023)
10.4 Chemical Revenue Growth Rate (2013-2023)
10.5 Microbiological Revenue Growth Rate (2013-2023)
11 Global Packaging Testing Market Segment by Application
11.1 Global Packaging Testing Revenue Market Share by Application (2013-2018)
11.2 Packaging Testing Market Forecast by Application (2018-2023)
11.3 Food & beverage Revenue Growth (2013-2018)
11.4 Agrochemicals Revenue Growth (2013-2018)
11.5 Pharmaceuticals Revenue Growth (2013-2018)
11.6 Personal care Revenue Growth (2013-2018)
12 Global Packaging Testing Market Size Forecast (2018-2023)
12.1 Global Packaging Testing Market Size Forecast (2018-2023)
12.2 Global Packaging Testing Market Forecast by Regions (2018-2023)
12.3 North America Packaging Testing Revenue Market Forecast (2018-2023)
12.4 Europe Packaging Testing Revenue Market Forecast (2018-2023)
12.5 Asia-Pacific Packaging Testing Revenue Market Forecast (2018-2023)
12.6 South America Packaging Testing Revenue Market Forecast (2018-2023)
12.7 Middle East and Africa Packaging Testing Revenue Market Forecast (2018-2023)
13 Research Findings and Conclusion
14 Appendix
14.1 Methodology
14.2 Data Source
List of Tables and Figures
Figure Packaging Testing Picture
Table Product Specifications of Packaging Testing
Table Global Packaging Testing and Revenue (Million USD) Market Split by Product Type
ProactiveWe manage our resources 24/7 to identify issues and address them before they become problems
Quality & ReliabilityWe are committed to providing reliable and highly accurate data with an excellent quality control system
Global Outreach6 Major regions and 40+ countries level analysis accomplished
Competitive PricingOur pricing strategy is highly competitive in the market, without compensating on the quality and the timeline of project delivery
